Jumuiya ya Madola dhidi ya Eberle : Tofauti kati ya masahihisho

Kutoka Wikipedia, kamusi elezo huru
Content deleted Content added
Nimeweza kubadili lugha kutoka kingereza kwenda kiswahili na kuweka jamii
(Hakuna tofauti)

Pitio la 18:12, 30 Julai 2022

Jumuiya ya Madola dhidi ya Eberle, 474 Pa. 548, 379 A.2d 90 (1977), [1] ni kesi ya jinai inayohusisha wajibu wa kurudi nyuma.[2] Kesi hiyo ilithibitisha kwamba ili kupinga uhalali au kisingizio cha kujitetea, upande wa mashtaka lazima uonyeshe kwamba mshtakiwa ambaye alitumia nguvu mbaya alikuwa na fursa salama ya kutoroka.[3][4]

  1. Madeja, C.; Plank, N.; Revta, R. (1975-12). "The neurosurgical nurse as a departmental assistant". Journal of Neurosurgical Nursing 7 (2): 99–101. ISSN 0047-2603. PMID 474. doi:10.1097/01376517-197512000-00007.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. "Designing Out Crime", Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Springer New York), 2014: 948–948, iliwekwa mnamo 2022-07-30 
  3. "best position to take reasonable steps to avoid the risk of loss created by the contract. In this regard, it is relevant to consider whether a contract may be frustrated if the risk of loss is foreseeable; whether either of the parties has been at fault, especially where the frustrating event is self-induced and whether there are reasonable steps which could have been taken by one of the parties which might have averted the risk of loss. Foreseeable risks", Sourcebook on Contract Law (Routledge-Cavendish), 1995-12-12: 365–367, ISBN 978-1-84314-151-8, iliwekwa mnamo 2022-07-30 
  4. "Designing Out Crime", Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Springer New York), 2014: 948–948, iliwekwa mnamo 2022-07-30